In an Aug 5, 2010 RTA article in the Az Daily Star we are treated to the inner workings of the leadership of the City of Tucson and the RTA. Do the personal animosities of the City Council determine the future of the RTA? According to the quotes in the article the City Council members don’t like the RTA board designated negotiator so will by-pass talking to him. They want to negotiate directly with the RTA board. This continues the pattern of the Tucson City Council not following the rules they themselves have often voted. In any elected office there is a need to delegate some tasks. In the case of the City Council it would seem the tasks may be delegated but there is no authority or accountability built in.
Councilwomen Regina Romero and Karin Uhlich frequently made a point of saying they want to negotiate with the RTA board of directors – made up of officials from all the local governments – and not with Hayes.
“I find it troubling that we as the mayor and council are negotiating with an unelected appointed director of the RTA,” Romero said, speaking about Hayes. “It should be before the RTA board.”
The RTA board authorized Hayes to negotiate with the city, just as the council empowered Letcher and City Attorney Mike Rankin to negotiate.
Here’s the complete article. You decide.
Gary Hayes, the Regional Transportation Authority’s executive director, threatened to shut down all work on Tucson’s $180 million modern streetcar after the City Council took no action Wednesday on a proposal to turn Sun Tran over to the RTA.
Hayes’ threat came in an angry, chest-jabbing confrontation with Tucson City Manager Mike Letcher just after a 6-1 council vote to continue negotiations but take no immediate action on a transfer of the bus system. Councilman Paul Cunningham voted no.
Shifting Sun Tran from a city service to an RTA responsibility has become a focal point in the four-day-old strike by Sun Tran workers, who believe the RTA’s more stable financial status would offer them more job security and a greater potential for pay raises.
During the meeting, Hayes accused Letcher several times of botching transfer negotiations. Hayes and the striking Teamsters Local 104 pushed for the council to transfer Sun Tran to the RTA. Letcher shot back that Hayes was trying to hold the city “hostage.”
After the meeting, Hayes asked to speak with Letcher, and he jabbed his finger into Letcher’s chest during the ensuing shouting match. Letcher pushed Hayes’ fingers away, and the RTA consultant Dan Sullivan screamed at Letcher as he walked away.
Several people surrounding the altercation said Hayes threatened to stop work on the streetcar in retaliation for the council taking no action on the Sun Tran transfer.
Letcher confirmed this, saying Hayes told him, “The streetcar is going to come to a screeching halt.”
The city manger said he had “a real problem” with “an unelected manager” making unilateral threats about a project that has such a huge potential economic benefit to the region.
The streetcar has been worked on by officials from several local governments, along with Southern Arizona’s congressional delegation, and it’s being funded by large federal grants.
“I’m concerned. I don’t have that kind of power,” Letcher said. “He didn’t like the way things went today.”
Hayes said his comments were misinterpreted. He said he told Letcher that he – Hayes – had pulled out all the stops to get agreements on the streetcar approved and that “we didn’t get a quid pro quo from the manager’s office” on the Sun Tran transfer.
In addition, he said he told Letcher that if the city did not meet its state-mandated requirement for transit funding, that could put the funding for the streetcar in jeopardy. He said those might be the comments that were misconstrued because of the heated nature of the conversation.
“It got a little testy; it got little heated,” Hayes said. “I just wasn’t happy with the role he played at the meeting, and I told him that.”
Hayes later said that he’s not in the position to stop work on the streetcar.
About 200 Teamsters and their supporters packed the council chambers for the meeting, and another 200 more massed outside. Neither the striking Teamsters nor the RTA officials had much good to say about the council’s decision.
“It doesn’t do anything for us,” said Andy Marshall, leader of Teamsters Local 104. “We’re still on strike with no end in sight.”
Hayes said the RTA board will likely hold a special meeting next Thursday, but he said he didn’t think its response would be much different from one in May, when it stopped the transfer negotiations because of the city’s demands.
“I don’t think the circumstances are any different” from those in May, Hayes said after the meeting. “They just want to keep talking about it. . . . They never seem to be satisfied.”
Councilwomen Regina Romero and Karin Uhlich frequently made a point of saying they want to negotiate with the RTA board of directors – made up of officials from all the local governments – and not with Hayes.
“I find it troubling that we as the mayor and council are negotiating with an unelected appointed director of the RTA,” Romero said, speaking about Hayes. “It should be before the RTA board.”
The RTA board authorized Hayes to negotiate with the city, just as the council empowered Letcher and City Attorney Mike Rankin to negotiate.
Hayes said the council members are trying to make the issue personal and are vilifying him because they contend he’s not representing the wishes of the RTA board. Hayes said he is representing the wishes of his board.
Letcher and Hayes also bickered during the meeting about an intergovernmental agreement between the two entities worth $4.5 million in reimbursements to Tucson that expired at the end of June.
Letcher said Hayes is holding the $4.5 million over the city’s head to force it to approve the transfer to the RTA. Hayes said it was the city’s fault that the agreement expired and that it was charging improper items to the RTA – although the RTA has approved the payments for four years.
Contact reporter Rob O’Dell at 573-4346 or rodell@azstarnet.com
Its just a matter of time until the grown-ups are forced to step in.
8 Comments
Leave a Reply
Pages
Blogroll
Misc Links
Categories
Archives
- April 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
1/2 cent for Police and Fire – yeah right! Who let Romero say to ‘wait for the Nov. vote to help fund Sun Tran’.
Reel in your politician Democrat party, this is getting pretty bush league guys.
“Do the personal animosities of the City Council determine the future of the RTA?” Really? this is what you take away from this article? The exec director of the RTA, in public, goes up to the City Manager and screams at him while jabbing him in the chest with his finger. RTA’s “consultant” stands behind Hayes screaming at the City Manager. All this can be seen on the video accompanying this article. And the reason for all this? Because Hayes didn’t get his way. But finding out what’s going with the RTA (why is he so worked up? What’s the back story) we get the same “look at how stupid the city is narrative”. You know, sometimes its not the City that’s acting stupid-and this is one of those times.
Sorry James but your analysis lacks some back story. Given the City Council’s very long record of micromanaging every decision, contradictory stories and policies that make following their logic beyond fantasy land and a proven history of implementing one policy at one meeting and then changing course during the same meeting. I would submit that Mr. Hayes and most any of the folks that have to deal with this Council would be more than peeved. I do not know Mr. Hayes nor any of the council members. But based on the history of the council and staff I would submit it is THEY that need to adjust attitudes and not the RTA folk.
The City doesn’t want to lose control of low bus fares and low income free passes. The $700k and $32m debate as to how much the City must contribute is pretty clear cut. The AZ Leg made sure to address how much could be ‘pushed off to RTA’. The Leg knew that this new $2.1b pot of money would look really good to a municipality so they put language in specifing the match to the 2003 Sun Tran funding levels, that’s where the $32m comes from.
It boils down to controlling the routes and fairs for the poor. These free bus riders translate into voters which translates into councils getting re-elected.
Please note the the current offer from the RTA guarantees the low income economy fare will not be changed for 5 years, and the RTA agreed to substantially follow the public notice procedures the city uses (and the federal ones) before any fare or route modifications.
And “admin” is correct. The RTA 1/2 sales tax is for ADDITIONAL services. The legislation forming the RTA was set up to prevent a “bait and switch” – it requires all jurisdictions in Pima county to keep funding their investment in transit. The language says that amount is to be adjusted annually by the GDP. The city attorney is trying to argue that the number should only be based on “Capital” spending, a position that appears to undermine the intent of the legislation.
I don’t dispute ANY of these statments. What I am ticked off at is that Hayes and his henchman get a pass because, in my opinion, criticizing anything other than the City is taboo. Is no one going to say Hayes’ behavior is unacceptable? What, Cactus Bill, would you say if Mike Letcher was doing the finger thumping on Hayes’ chest? It is childish behavior and makes me wonder why he went off like that. And if your statement that “based on the history of the council and staff I would submit it is THEY that need to adjust attitudes and not the RTA folk” means that county, UA, state, or RTA employees (all public employees mind you)are free to act like backroom holligans in public but the City is somehow held to a higher standard I completely disagree.
James L, you are correct. This is totally unacceptable for any public official to act like that and hold the public hostage. Word is that this is the beginning of the end for Hayes and henchmen. People have had enough of the bullying and intimidation. Insiders are starting to speak out and a full investigation of RTA leadership, including the Board, will happen soon. Hiring friends and family, illegal spending, secret deals with special interest groups. No accountability for the agency that claims to be so accountable. Stay tuned.
James,
If a Mea Culpa, Mea Maxima Culpa will solve the problem then by all means. Wear out all the rugs necessary. Sack Cloth and ashes for the whole lot of em. I will say it again. Unless and until the City of Tucson leadership lives by the rules they themselves set up we will continue to see a disfunctional set of policies that will burden the taxpayers for decades to come.