Authors on this blog have called from Mike Hein’s head. After 3 years on the job the drum beats are sounding. With one open seat and two freshman incumbents up for re-election it’s going to be an interesting 9 months. During an election year the word ’scapegoat’ comes to mind.
Being the City Manager with this, Overwhelming underdogs of a council must make you want to hide under the covers each morning.
The City Manager definitely has a role in each and every one of the decisions that have lead us to the complete mess we are in today. He’s culpable and part of the problem for sure. Hein is the one making $240k+ while the 7 people that collectively tell him what to do make $180k combined! He’s playing a high stakes game but the game board, rules and even the numbers on the dice change from day to day.
Finanical Down Turn
The city is falling on hard times financially and the pressure is on. A manager needs to make quick adjustments to get us through the mess. As long as those adjustments don’t affect artists, free rent arrangements to non profits, funding for working poor, Job Path, graffiti classes, Kidco, Department of a(Organize The )Neighborhoods Resources, public access TV, bus fares, or cuts to any of the 5000 plus employees that are protected by a strong union he’s got full latitude to do what’s right for the community.
What can he cut? Police, road maintenance, garbage services and emergency response staff and equipment. You know, all the fluffy stuff a city wastes their budget on.
So if you can’t cut expense you gotta raise money. You raise money in a crazy thing called taxes. Here’s some of the BUSINESS specific ‘revenue enhancements’ implemented and or being concidered;
Ad Tax
Rental Tax
Impact Fee (ok by not repealing it its still at tax)
Tax to keep your development plan relevant for multiple years
Utility Tax
Water meter hook up tax
Sign Permit Tax
Building Permit Tax
Business Licence Tax
Secondary Property Tax
Increased Landfill Prices
Increased Commercial Waste Fees
Increased Roll Off Fees
The ‘revenue enhancements’ affecting the RESIDENTS of our city;
Increased Utility Tax
Water Fees Increase up to 10% (on top of 8% last year)
Proposed garbage fee increase
Read our previous post HERE
So if you’re the city manger under this council you are officially between a rock and a hard place. Hein is dealing with so many council sacred cows and pet projects it’s tough to know where to turn. Hein can’t cut or raise revenues to certain populations. Hein is forced to focus increases on the one special interest not represented on this current council, the business community.
How does government pay for all the staff, programs, arts groups, low income housing? Oh yeah collecting sales tax from businesses that are brave enough to open in the city of Tucson. Get the picture?
There Are Short Comings….
I agree on management of Rio Nuevo. It’s been botched before Hein came aboard and until the legislature demands new people overseeing the entire
project it will be messed up long after he leaves. Shelko and Barr, aren’t cutting it. Installing Hecker, Lyons and allowing Trasoff’s chief of staff’s wife into management/ oversight positions is highly questionable. Emails from personal accounts to cover tracks…..not good.
MTCVB and TREO need to pull their weight and function in the light of day. Development Services needs a complete cultural shift.
Hein pissed off council staff and learned how much power they actually had. Remember THIS near axing from last year?
Where is his plan? All I’m seeing is reaction to the follies that go on around him. How about a 5 year plan? A vison on where we are going?
What’s the deal with the botched search for a new police chief? Do we blame that on Hein?
Why Is Hein Worth Keeping?
What I like about Hein is his early shake up of the Tucson city bureaucracy. In a climate where you can’t fire
people all you can do is shift them around. By moving around department heads and entrenched fiefdoms Hein took control of the staff. It sets him up to either put the right people in place and let them do their job or micromanage every aspect of every department he’s responsible for.
He thinks outside the box and isn’t afraid to take a different approach to a problem.
If he does go what can we expect from the next victim. Hopefully a potential candidate for the job reads the papers and our blog to get a sense of what they are in for. Tucson could be a career killer.
7 Comments
Leave a Reply
Pages
Blogroll
Misc Links
Categories
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
“What’s the deal with the botched search for a new police chief? Do we blame that on Hein?” Yes we do. The city charter calls for the City Manager to make the appointment and the Council to confirm it. All Hein had to do was submit a name but he didn’t have the guts to do so. The Rio Nuevo debacle is laid right at his feet. In January 2006 he issued a memo to the Mayor and Council and took direct responsibility for the project. He gets credit for the TIF extension-he should get the blame for the failure. Since then Presidio Terrace failed, the Town West project and the Post have been left to wither, the first arena contract was cancelled (it would be built by now if Hein hadn’t botched that), and the entire west side cultural development has cratered. The Legislature held a hearing on the issue in February and Hein sent Shelko. Where was the Manager when Rio Nuevo is hanging in the balance.On top of that the Finance director left after reporting corrupt practices to the council. It has been without a director for over a year. The Budget department has been without a director for over 4 years. The City is in shamables and its because of the 10th floor incompetence. When you’re the top dog you take responsibility.
Well said, James L.!
Word has it that Uhlich was busy trying to throw Hein under the bus on John C. Scott’s show today.
Hein is ball-less.
I agree with James too. Yes, Hein fired some people who were part of the problem with the second phase of Rio Nuevo (Karen Thoreson and John Updike). That house-cleaning was welcomed, but the reason he did it was to consolidate personal control over the project. He wanted all the decision-making to be concentrated in his hands, with Jaret Barr deployed as his hatchet man.
Thoreson and Updike were James Keene’s people, and Hein despised Keene.
All of the council members should throw Hein under the bus, shun Nina Trasoff, and blame her and Hein for the last three or four years of failure while they cut a deal with the Republicans in the Legislature to save the funding.
Once Hein got rid of Thoreson and Updike by encouraging them to look elsewhere, he unloaded others he didn’t like by offering them a generous early retirement package.
It’s not like he replaced a bunch of slugs with a dynamic and competent new team. He kept on lots of other slugs that most others would have dumped a long time ago, and he brought on people like Karen Masbruch (so-so), Richard Miranda (no thank you), and Jaret Barr (thug). Greg Shelko never understood downtown, and has always been a very square peg in a round hole, but seems to have kept his job by being loyal. Shelko has become a human shield to protect Hein.
So the argument that he is a good city manager because he unloaded a few people in his first year isn’t very persuasive.
He’s actually diminished productivity among city workers, in my view, because he’s trashed morale. Lots of city employees are hard-working, competent people who want to be given meaningful assignments and want to do a good job. The scandals, the lies, the deception, the intimidation . . . it’s all taken its toll.
And here is another example of his professionalism: http://www.azstarnet.com/altds/pastframe/metro/286399