Education is a hot potato right now in AZ. This press release came our way from the legislative leadership.
A prior post regarding Antenori’s Op-Ed denial by the Az Star pointed out that;
Raise taxes you say and and cut less? Here’s an interesting fact I heard from another State legislator; it took Arizona 100 years to grow it’s budget to $6 billion. It took Napolitano only 4 years to grow it to $10.3 billion. Do you think we over spent a bit?
Google, Education Spending Arizona, and you’ll find a bunch of sources for yourself. Look at the issue and do some homework, then make up your own mind.
| Education Funding |
Rank |
Source(s)1 |
| § Estimated Funding Per Pupil (from all sources): $9700 |
|
JLBC, 2009 |
| § Estimated Funding Total from all sources: $10.3 Billion |
|
JLBC, 2009 |
| § K-12 & Higher Education comprise nearly 60% of the state General Fund |
|
JLBC, 2009 |
| § % increase in expenditures over 20 years (in inflation-adjusted $$) |
4th |
ALEC, 2006 |
| § Funding Per Classroom of students |
26th |
ALEC, 2006 |
| § Total Revenues from State Government |
19th |
NEA, 2008 |
| Teacher Salaries |
|
|
| § Average salary of all instructional staff2 |
12th |
NEA & BEA, 2006 |
| § Average salary of all instructional staff relative to per capita income |
2nd |
NEA & BEA, 2006 |
| § Average salary of public school teachers |
24th |
NEA & BEA, 2006 |
| § Average salary of public school teachers relative to per capita income |
17th |
NEA & BEA, 2006 |
| Academic Achievement |
|
|
| § ACT composite scores |
21st |
ALEC, 2007 |
| § SAT composite scores |
27th |
ALEC, 2007 |
| § Of the 26 states where the SAT is more predominantly taken than the ACT |
3rd |
ALEC, 2007 |
| § Overall Student Achievement |
31st |
ALEC, 2007 |
| Enrollment |
|
|
| § K-12 student enrollment |
13th |
NEA, 2008 |
| § % increase in enrollment over 10 years |
2nd |
ALEC, 2006 |
| § % increase in enrollment over 20 years |
2nd |
ALEC, 2006 |
| Other |
|
|
| § Charter School Laws |
4th |
ALEC, 2007 |
| § % of individuals 18-24 years-old with a Bachelor Degree |
11th |
NSF, 2005 |
Why it is INACCURATE to say Arizona ranks 49th in Education:
§ This is just ONE statistic, based solely on a “per pupil” spending calculation
§ The “per pupil” spending calculation does not take into account the following:
i. uniformity as to what funding categories go into the calculation from state-to-state (for example, Arizona has consistently ranked at the top for capital expenditures per pupil, but none of those dollars are factored into Arizona’s per pupil calculations)
ii. actual dollars spent in the classroom from district-to-district or state-to-state
iii. cost of living adjustments
iv. voter-established constitutional requirements/limitations for education funding
v. estimates and redundancies in student counts
vi. calculation variances that occur because of rapid growth issues faced by states like Arizona, versus states experiencing little, no or negative growth
§ It makes absolutely no sense for public policy to be driven by one isolated apples-to-oranges statistic, which looks at education spending in a vacuum
§ There are better gauges to education ranking that are outcome-based indicators, such as student achievement, test scores, etc.
§ The per-pupil expenditure is really a reflection of class size, excluding the idea of efficiency
§ A general state analysis by ALEC, as well as one by the RAND Corporation of California’s massive (and expensive) effort to reduce class sizes, has found no correlation between class sizes and test scores.
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Pages
Blogroll
Misc Links
Categories
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
Dear Arizona Kid:
I just came across this website today and was surprised that this posting (and the Goldwater piece above) didn’t fall under your “BS Alert” section.
After we received this list of statistics from the Senate Majority office, we actually DID check to see if the information was current & valid. For the most part, it isn’t. A full report which examines each claim can be found here:
http://www.aasbo.org/images/pressrels/pdf/Arizona_K-12_EXAMINATION_OF_THE_FACTS_Word_97_Repaired_Table.pdf
As taxpayers, we should be outraged that this type of misinformation can come from one of our highest state offices. This is not “spin” from a political party or special interest group – our tax dollars paid for this.
Our legislators are charged with making some difficult choices right now. We need them to be properly informed and dealing with facts. When we presented evidence to the legislature and governor’s offices that the statistical sheet that you posted was riddled with errors and made-up study names and source information, we were told that there really wasn’t anything we could do about it…one person crisply noted that “there is no rule against lying in the Arizona legislature”, and that, as citizens, there wasn’t much we could do to stop the Senate Majority office from issuing the information.
Although we may disagree on political ideology, I hope we can all agree that truth still plays an important role in our state. Please insist on it from your government officials.