I covered the fact that Arizona and Tucson in particular has relied too heavily on growth for our economic prosperity. Read the posts HERE and HERE. An email that came a cross my desk this weekend exemplifies the problem we are having even clearer. Byron Schlomack, Ph.D from the Goldwater Institute noted that:
A few weeks ago, I pointed out that Arizona’s economy has been disproportionately fueled by the construction industry. In 2006, the proportion of Arizona’s total economic output from construction stood at 7.4 percent, 50 percent higher than the U.S. proportion of 4.8 percent. I attributed this to the relatively high commercial property taxes assessed at a rate twice as high as that of residential property.
Interestingly, manufacturing contributed more to Arizona’s total economic output, 8.1 percent, in 2006 than construction did. But at 11.8 percent, the share of U.S. output from manufacturing is almost 50 percent higher than Arizona’s.Arizona’s property tax structure contributes to this volatility. Residential property taxes are assessed at half the rate of commercial property taxes. As a result, commercial property, which constitutes less than a third of total property value in the state, pays nearly half of all property taxes according to the Arizona Tax Research Association.
To create a fully diversified economy, Arizona policymakers should pay close attention to what they tax. They’ve rolled out the welcome mat to the volatile construction industry, which is fine, but they need to do the same for other industries. If we want people in all those homes, we have to welcome other businesses too, and that means lowering taxes on commercial property.
We’ve established that construction is a major engine on our state. The goal in any economy is for NEW MONEY to enter the system. Construction fueled by people moving to our state is new money. Foriegn firms investing in our state is new money. Manufacturing and exporting goods out of the state or country is new money into our system. From 2001 to 2005 Arizona’s value-added from manufacturing decreased, in fact we dropped more than anyone in the U.S.
While most of our regional competitors (Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Nevada, Idaho) were increasing their manufacturing sectors, New Mexico by 200 percent, Arizona’s decreased 16 percent. This is all the more evidence that our tax structure is determining our fate.
Scholmach points to our states need to equalize the income tax system:
If we choose to get government spending at all levels under control and then rationalize our tax system by making it more lucrative to open a business, we can avoid becoming the biggest bedroom community in the nation. It’s worth rising to the challenge.
1 Comment
Leave a Reply
Pages
Blogroll
Misc Links
Categories
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008

You know, I have to tell you, I really enjoy this blog and the insight from everyone who participates. I find it to be refreshing and very informative. I wish there were more blogs like it. Anyway, I felt it was about time I posted, I